I'm currently working as a Research Scholar at the Centre for the Governance of Artificial Intelligence and on a DPhil in the Faculty of Law of the University of Oxford. My doctoral research focuses on the application of Anglo-Canadian tort law to events performed via machine learning systems, particularly generative AI.
I evaluate the potential for language models to create statements upon which persons will reasonably rely and the attendant potential for liability under the Hedley Byrne principle in English and Canadian law.
Libel via Language Models
forthcoming 2024
P Wills, Osgoode Hall LJ
I evaluate the potential for language models to create defamatory statements and analyse how such statements will be treated in Canadian and English defamation law.
I argue that the unique Canadian common law cause of action called “constructive expropriation” by the Supreme Court of Canada in Annapolis Group Inc v Halifax Regional Municipality, 2022 SCC 36 is, and has always been, a wrongly conceived tort. I argue that legislative intervention is required to address the matter.
I reconsider the legal nature of the Independent Assessment Process (IAP) of the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement (IRSSA). I argue the IAP should have been considered an arbitration. I construct a test for identifying when a process is an “arbitration”, show this part of the IAP meets that test, and evaluate treating this process as an arbitration would have affected the process.
D Matyas, P Wills, B Dewitt, 48(1) Canadian Public Policy 186–208
We explore the Canadian court system’s response to COVID-19 and the prospects for administering justice amid disasters through the lens of resilience. We propose that the business of judging during shocks can become more integral to the business as usual of court systems.
We argue that s 24(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms permits awarding damages for legislative action, that underlying constitutional principles limit the type of damages that should be awarded, and that Supreme Court precedent to date suggests that compensatory damages should be available only if a legislature has acted negligently. We suggest the concomitant standard of care requires the legislature to obtain properly qualified legal advice.
O Evans, O Cotton-Barratt, L Finnveden, A Bales, A Balwit, P Wills, L Righetti, W Saunders
We identify the potential for AI systems to produce lies and the broader consequences of AI-generated falsehoods. We propose a standard of avoiding negligent falsehoods and propose institutions to evaluate AI systems before and after they are deployed in the real world.